TSTP Solution File: NUM754^1 by Satallax---3.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Satallax---3.5
% Problem : NUM754^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 13:56:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_frac,type,
frac: $tType ).
thf(ty_pf,type,
pf: frac > frac > frac ).
thf(ty_z,type,
z: frac ).
thf(ty_u,type,
u: frac ).
thf(ty_y,type,
y: frac ).
thf(ty_eq,type,
eq: frac > frac > $o ).
thf(ty_moref,type,
moref: frac > frac > $o ).
thf(ty_x,type,
x: frac ).
thf(sP1,plain,
( sP1
<=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).
thf(sP2,plain,
( sP2
<=> ! [X1: frac] :
( ( eq @ x @ y )
=> ( ( moref @ z @ X1 )
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).
thf(sP3,plain,
( sP3
<=> ( ( moref @ z @ u )
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).
thf(sP4,plain,
( sP4
<=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
( ( eq @ x @ X1 )
=> ( ( moref @ X2 @ X3 )
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).
thf(sP5,plain,
( sP5
<=> ( moref @ z @ u ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).
thf(sP6,plain,
( sP6
<=> ! [X1: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ y ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).
thf(sP7,plain,
( sP7
<=> ( ( eq @ x @ y )
=> sP3 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).
thf(sP8,plain,
( sP8
<=> ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ z @ x ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).
thf(sP9,plain,
( sP9
<=> ( sP8
=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ u ) @ ( pf @ u @ y ) )
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ ( pf @ u @ y ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).
thf(sP10,plain,
( sP10
<=> ( eq @ x @ y ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).
thf(sP11,plain,
( sP11
<=> ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ u ) @ ( pf @ u @ y ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])]) ).
thf(sP12,plain,
( sP12
<=> ( sP11
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ ( pf @ u @ y ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP12])]) ).
thf(sP13,plain,
( sP13
<=> ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP13])]) ).
thf(sP14,plain,
( sP14
<=> ! [X1: frac] :
( sP13
=> ( sP8
=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ u ) @ X1 )
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP14])]) ).
thf(sP15,plain,
( sP15
<=> ! [X1: frac] : ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ x ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP15])]) ).
thf(sP16,plain,
( sP16
<=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
( ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X1 )
=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X2 )
=> ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
=> ( moref @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP16])]) ).
thf(sP17,plain,
( sP17
<=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac] :
( sP10
=> ( ( moref @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ y @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP17])]) ).
thf(sP18,plain,
( sP18
<=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X4: frac] :
( ( eq @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ( ( moref @ X3 @ X4 )
=> ( moref @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP18])]) ).
thf(sP19,plain,
( sP19
<=> ( moref @ ( pf @ z @ x ) @ ( pf @ u @ y ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP19])]) ).
thf(sP20,plain,
( sP20
<=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac] :
( sP13
=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ X1 )
=> ( ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ u ) @ X2 )
=> ( moref @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP20])]) ).
thf(sP21,plain,
( sP21
<=> ( sP13
=> sP9 ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP21])]) ).
thf(sP22,plain,
( sP22
<=> ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X4: frac] :
( ( moref @ X1 @ X2 )
=> ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
=> ( ( eq @ X2 @ X4 )
=> ( moref @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP22])]) ).
thf(satz62h,conjecture,
sP19 ).
thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
~ sP19,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz62h]) ).
thf(1,plain,
( ~ sP1
| sP6 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(2,plain,
( ~ sP6
| sP11 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(3,plain,
( ~ sP1
| sP15 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( ~ sP15
| sP8 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( ~ sP20
| sP14 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(6,plain,
( ~ sP14
| sP21 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(7,plain,
( ~ sP21
| ~ sP13
| sP9 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(8,plain,
( ~ sP9
| ~ sP8
| sP12 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(9,plain,
( ~ sP12
| ~ sP11
| sP19 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ~ sP22
| sP16 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(11,plain,
( ~ sP16
| sP20 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(12,plain,
( ~ sP18
| sP4 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(13,plain,
( ~ sP4
| sP17 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(14,plain,
( ~ sP17
| sP2 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(15,plain,
( ~ sP2
| sP7 ),
inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(16,plain,
( ~ sP7
| ~ sP10
| sP3 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(17,plain,
( ~ sP3
| ~ sP5
| sP13 ),
inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).
thf(e,axiom,
sP10 ).
thf(m,axiom,
sP5 ).
thf(satz44,axiom,
sP22 ).
thf(satz62g,axiom,
sP18 ).
thf(satz58,axiom,
sP1 ).
thf(18,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,e,m,satz44,satz62g,satz58,h0]) ).
thf(0,theorem,
sP19,
inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[18,h0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM754^1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.14/0.12 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 10:40:58 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.37 % Mode: mode213
% 0.20/0.37 % Inferences: 37
% 0.20/0.37 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------